Recruiting and Retaining Doctoral Students
John Bernthal , Ph.D.
University of Nebraska
Maurice Mendel, Ph.D.
The University of Memphis
Introduction
-
Declining number of doctoral degrees granted in Speech-Language Pathology
and Audiology since 1981/82 source of concern. (See Figure 1 from
the 1998-99 Survey of Undergraduate and Graduate Programs conducted
by the Information Exchange Program of the Council of Academic Programs
in Communication Sciences and Disorders; Petrosino, Lieberman,
McNeil, & Shinn, 1999).
| Table 1. Doctoral degrees in audiology and speech-language
pathology |
|
|
| Year |
Audiology |
Speech-
Language
Pathology |
| 1981/82 |
37 |
116 |
| 1983/84 |
21 |
68 |
| 1985/86 |
28 |
72 |
| 1987/88 |
41 |
74 |
| 1989/90 |
45 |
83 |
| 1991/92 |
26 |
69 |
| 1993/94 |
36 |
65 |
| 1995/96 |
28 |
66 |
| 1997/98 |
14 |
64 |
-
Must be viewed in context of annual growth or decline in the number of
doctorates awarded in all fields from 1957-1997. (See Figure 2 from
the Summary Report 1997, Doctorate Recipients from United States
Universities published by the National Science Foundation, the National
Institutes of Health, the National Endowment for the Humanities,
the U.S. Department of Education, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture).
| Table 2. Annual Growth or Decline in Doctorates |
|
| Year |
Percent |
| 1957 |
2 |
| 1958 |
3 |
| 1959 |
5 |
| 1960 |
6 |
| 1961 |
8 |
| 1962 |
11 |
| 1963 |
11.5 |
| 1964 |
13 |
| 1965 |
14 |
| 1966 |
9.5 |
| 1967 |
13 |
| 1968 |
12 |
| 1969 |
11.5 |
| 1970 |
14 |
| 1971 |
8 |
| 1972 |
4 |
| 1973 |
3 |
| 1974 |
-2 |
| 1975 |
-0.5 |
| 1976 |
0 |
| 1977 |
-4 |
| 1978 |
-3 |
| 1979 |
2 |
| 1980 |
-0.5 |
| 1981 |
2 |
| 1982 |
-0.5 |
| 1983 |
0.5 |
| 1984 |
0.25 |
| 1985 |
0 |
| 1986 |
3 |
| 1987 |
2 |
| 1988 |
4 |
| 1989 |
3 |
| 1990 |
5 |
| 1991 |
4.5 |
| 1992 |
4 |
| 1993 |
3 |
| 19945 |
3.5 |
| 1996 |
2.5 |
| 1996 |
2 |
| 1997 |
1 |
-
Significant additional fact is the large number of doctorates granted in
the 1960’s. (See Figure 2.) Many of these doctoral degree recipients
who form the core faculty in Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology
are nearing retirement age.
Recruiting issues
-
Web page (72% of first contact) that stresses the doctoral program together
with content.
-
Importance of Person to Person contact
-
Campus visits.
-
Continued contact with candidates.
-
Recruit promising Master’s students before they leave campus; follow up
after they have graduated
-
Admit Bachelor students into doctoral program.
-
Undergraduate research experiences.
-
Assign mentor/sponsor as part of the admission process.
-
Mentor/Advisor critical need for each newly admitted doctoral student
-
Follow-up visits with graduates within the first two years of their professional
life.
-
Bring a cohort group of new students into doctoral program.
-
Financial support - Money. - Obtain stipend supplements.
-
Be at a university with high overall academic reputation.
-
Find a niche.
-
Systematic research program.
-
Faculty behavior
- Tell students that academic life provides incredible opportunities
to do interesting things, contribute in useful ways, and hang
out
with interesting people.
- Have faculty quit whining about their jobs.
- Need to stress positive benefits arising from careers
in academia to
currently enrolled students
-
Have graduate assistants at Master level focus on research rather than
being office assistants.
-
Awareness that 5% of doctoral graduates work in R1 universities, yet R1
institutions educate 80% of the graduates.
-
Include more emphasis on decision making/clinical outcomes research into
our programs.
-
Consider more Informatics in research programs - evidenced-based decision
making/policy and outcomes of research across entire rehabilitation spectrum.
-
Location.
-
Study the uniqueness of gender issues in doctoral study.
Retention issues
-
Importance of having Planning Committee assist each first year doctoral
student in the creation of an Academic Plan.
-
Creation of a realistic timeline, which is tied to continuation of funding.
Necessary to show evidence of timely progress toward the degree in order
to maintain funding.
-
First Year Research Project found to be efficient model for introducing
first year doctoral students to design and completion of a research activity.
Opportunity to carry project to publication if appropriate.
-
Qualifying Examination Committee
-
Dissertation Committee
ABD issues
- Article in March 24, 2000 issue of the Chronicle
of Higher Education,
titled “A new push for ABD’s to cross the finish
line."
- Suggested activities include:
Boot camp
Personnel trainer
Self-help books
On-line help
References:
Leatherman, C. (2000, March). A. new push for ABD’s to cross the
finish line. The Chronicle of Higher Education,
March 24, 2000, A18-A20.
Petrosino, L., Lieberman, R. J., McNeil, M.R., &
Shinn, R. E. (1999). 1998-99 Survey of undergraduate
and graduate programs conducted by the Information Exchange Program.
Minneapolis, MN: Council of Academic Programs in Communication Sciences
and Disorders.
Summary Report 1997, Doctorate Recipients from United States Universities,
published by the National Science Foundation, the National Institutes of
Health, the National Endowment for the Humanities, the U.S. Department
of Education, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture. (www.nsf.gov/sbe/srs/sengdr/summ97/summ97.pdf)